Douglas
Allchin
University of Minnesota, USA
Boyle's law is not universal
and invariant, as implied by the term 'law'. It does not hold at high
pressures, low temperatures, or low volumes. It is based on constant temperature
and a balanced electric field. It varies for different gases. Boyle's
"law" depends on context. So, too, for many other laws basic
to introductory science education, such as Ohm's law, Galileo's law of
the pendulum, or Mendel's law of independent assortment. The behavior
of gases and other phenomena described by these "laws" are not
lawlike at all. When science educators teach simple laws as fundamental
to natural order, they thus mislead students. An approach to science as
seeking laws interprets nature narrowly, based on a view of society as
ordered by universal rules, or laws. It inappropriately inscribes human
conceptions of machines and power into nature. But what would nature or
science look like without laws? Nature seems complex, with only patches
of regularity. Causality may be framed instead in terms of state-systems.
Alternatively, scientists may, and often do, focus on experiments as concrete
models. Boyle's J-tube offers a basis for analogy, foregoing any reduction
to a law. Thinking in terms of models also highlights the role of scope
and context in scientific reasoning. Science educators may thus begin
replacing the flawed concept of laws with understanding of models and
model-based reasoning. An ideal science education program will thus be
rooted in working with apparatus and teaching concrete experiment-based
reasoning.
Jeff
Babb (presenting) and James Currie,
University of Winnipeg, Canada
In 1696 Johann Bernoulli obtained
the brachistochrone, the curve of quickest descent, and posed it as a
problem to the mathematicians of Europe. This paper examines the fascinating
history of the brachistochrone and explores its relation to Snells
law of refraction, Fermats principle of least time and the calculus
of variations. Computerized and experimental demonstrations of the brachistochrone
are discussed and the related problems of determining the isochrone, tautochrone
and cycloid are also considered.
Fabio
Bevilacqua
Universita di Pavia, Italy
Elizabeth
Cavicchi
Dibner Institute for the History
of Science and Technology, MIT, USA
Nine honors undergraduates
at a public university found unexpected surprises when asked by their
teacher to look in a mirror at an angle, swing weights on a fishing line,
and light a bulb with a battery. Euclid, Galileo, Volta, and others long
ago explored these simple experiments seriously, and the students
exposed to historical accounts and apparatus, and encouraged to
observe carefully began to see why. Old queries were repeated with
modern instruments: focusing mirrors to ignite their school newspaper;
timing a pendulum with a cell phone, dissecting an Energy Saver
bulb, beaming lasers into jello, and congealing ice cream with liquid
nitrogen! Respect deepened for historical predecessors, and for each others
fierce inventions and thoughtful conjectures. When encouraged
to develop a shared understanding of both history and phenomena, the students
recast themselves as thoughtful and reflective explorers of the physical
world. They became a community of scientists and gained firsthand
insight into how shared knowledge is created.
Michael
Eckert
Deutsches Museum Munich, Germany
Visualization is a powerful
tool for science teaching: Magnetic field lines are visualized by iron
filings in the vicinity of permanent magnets; optical interference is
illustrated by superposing water waves; elementary particles are pictured
by their traces in bubble chamber images. But the relation between image
and concept is not always as obvious as the visual impression suggests.
Images do not speak by themselves but need interpretation based on shared
beliefs. Context matters. I will illustrate the relationship between visualization
and scientific knowledge with historic images of flow phenomena, from
Leonardo da Vincis drawings to modern computational fluid dynamics.
Zofia
Golab-Meyer
Institute of Physics Jagellonian
University, Cracow, Poland
Abstract: Physics is not an
easy subject for understanding, so in consequence is not easy for teaching
in school. The origin of many difficulties lies on the abstract, mathematical
language in which all physics notion laws are formulated. This language
is often beyond developmental level of high school students. Examples
of easier and more difficult subjects for students are demonstrated and
discussed.
The role of observations and experiments are crucial in doing physics.
However, the experiments, on the level of construction of physical laws
play different role in phenomenological laws, and different in so called
great theories (as Newton Laws, Gravity, Electromagnetism).
Peter
Heering
Carl von Ossietzky University
of Oldenburg, Germany
One aspect of scientific understanding
is the notion of science as a cultural activity. In this respect, enabling
students to redo historical experiments plays a central role as their
unlikeness to modern experiments is obvious. However, this is not only
a question of materials and procedures, but also of a changing notion
of how scientific knowledge is to be constructed and what purpose science
has to serve. Thus, being confronted with historical standards and notions
can enable students to realise their own beliefs of how science is to
be done.
Particularly experiments from the eighteenth century enlightenment seem
to be very useful in this respect. One central aspect of these experiments
is the importance of politeness, thus the understanding of scientific
practice is a more collective one. This emphasis is particularly useful
for teaching situations as the experiments were in particular designed
in order to be performed by (or in front of) a group of lay persons. Moreover,
entertainment goes hand in hand with natural philosophy, thus these experiments
have a strong motivating potential that also works nowadays.
In my presentation I am going to discuss experiences made in demonstrating
such experiments to an audience. In doing so, I intend to show the educational
potential of experiments that were developed in a style of experimentation
in which politeness was a crucial aspect.
Peter
Heering, Daniel Osewold,
Carl von Ossietzky University
of Oldenburg, Germany
Arthur Stinner,
University of Manitoba, Canada
Stephen Klassen
University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg,
Canada
In the teaching of modern physics
to high school and university classes, Robert Millikan must be considered
one of the most relevant experimentalists of the 20th century. The experiments
that established the numerical value of the charge of the electron is
a central topic in physics classes. However, the historical context and
the difficulties associated with these experiments are seldom made explicit
to the students. Students frequently encounter these difficulties in producing
adequate data without understanding where these problems come from. In
order to make the experiences associated with the replication of these
fundamental experiments more authentic, as well as to establish new approaches
to implement historical aspects in science education, the Oldenburg and
Winnipeg groups are going to carry out a three year research project.
We will describe the development and testing of this project that will
contain educational as well as historical materials.
Stephen
Klassen
University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg,
Canada
The Millikan oil-drop experiment
has been characterized both as one of the most beautiful physics
experiments of all time and, certainly, as one of the most frustrating
of all the exercises in the undergraduate physics laboratory. The manner
in which the Millikan experiment is portrayed in physics textbooks and
in laboratory instructions is investigated both from the pedagogical and
history-of-science perspective. Observations are related to Niaz
(2000) analysis of the Millikan-Ehrenhaft controversy and Hodsons
(1993) categorization scheme for laboratory exercises. Based on recent
work utilizing history of science and the story form, proposed improvements
are outlined.
Panagiotis
Kokkotas
University of Athens, University
of Cyprus
Our paper concerns the presentation
of an in-service primary school teachers training program which is based
on the potential role that History of Science has for promoting the learning
of physics. The training program is based on socioconstructivist and sociocultural
learning principles with the intention: to help teachers to appropriate
basic knowledge about the topic of the fall of bodies, to make explicit
through the exploitation of authentic historical science events on the
above topic (Aristotles, Galileos and Newtons interpretations
on the fall of bodies) the contemporary views about the NOS. This could
be done through a variety of teaching and learning strategies (e.g. debates
- argumentation, group work, simulations) that exploit authentic historical
science events in the topic of the fall of bodies.
László
Kovács
Berzsenyi Daniel College, Szombathely,
Hungary
Károly Simonyi achieved
the first artificial nuclear disintegration with the help of accelerated
particles in Hungary at the Sopron University in 22-23 dec.1951. The accelerator
was a Van de Graff generator made by his team. One can see it as an exhibition
item at the Eötvös University Science Faculty Budapest.
Simonyi was a founder and one of the leaders of the Central Physical Research
Institute in Budapest in 1952.
Simonyi was a professor at the Technical University Budapest. He was an
excellent teacher, was familiar with the students knowledge, gave
very good lectures and wrote useful schoolbooks for students in the field
of theoretical and practical electricity and electronics. We will give
some examples from his definitions and explanations. We will also discuss
his theories on education.
He was a very accomplished man and dealt with the history of physics in
a special artistic way. He wrote a number of books, one of them became
very famous, namely The Cultural History of Physics", which
was translated and published in Germany. During our lecture we will show
some parts of this book.
Pierre
Lauginie
Universite Paris-Sud, France
To weigh Earth: why and how?
A problem posed by geologists during the XVIIIth century: getting a first
information about our Earths deep interior from its mean density;
then turning to an astronomical problem related to the gravitational constant
G and planets perturbations from the XIXth century: Earth as a mass standard
to weigh the whole solar system. Cavendishs report of his first
accurate determination of the Earths density in 1798 is considered
as the first modern scientific paper: Cavendishs scientific style
and its innovations will be carefully examined. Miniaturized pedagogical
variants of the original torsion balance as said a scale
to weigh the Worlds are nowadays in use in universities,
a very typical example of our experimental approach of the History of
Science: accepting simplifying opportunities brought by modern techniques
and materials, while retaining the essentials of the original concepts.
Meanwhile, improved versions of the gravitational torsion balance have
been in use through the XIXth and XXth centuries as a research tool (G
determinations, gravimetry), and again at the very beginning of the XXIst
one, recently yielding a one order of magnitude leap in G-accuracy. A
remarkable precision tool over two centuries!
Shu-Chiu
Liu
Carl von Ossietzky University
of Oldenburg, Germany
The present work is concerned
about the integration of pre-scientific knowledge into teaching-learning
sequences in school science with a specified theoretical basis from a
conceptual change perspective. The central point of this theoretical basis
is, to enhance students understanding of the intended scientific
knowledge alternative ideas and perspectives should be provided and serve
as bridging representations while students are faced with
a new set of ideas which often conflicts their personal view. One of the
most powerful representations of this kind is, as argued based on empirical
evidence, particular pre-scientific knowledge which has similar conceptual
grounds to students. Empirical evidence discussed in the paper originates
from studies on students concepts regarding two scientific topics:
models of the universe and the nature of heat.
A theoretical framework and instructional approaches of integrating pre-scientific
knowledge into teaching-learning sequences aiming to foster students
conceptual change are thus derived from these investigative results.
Ralph
Mason
University of Manitoba, Canada
Archimedes is considered to be one of the three greatest scientists of all
time. Unfortunately, the written products to have survived from antiquity
(through multiple transcriptions over time) provide only the final results
of Archimedes' thinking. Often, whether it is the infinite series that approximates
pi, the formula for the centre of gravity of triangles, or the product law
for balancing the forces of a lever, we have no record of the processes
by which Archimedes developed his understanding of the principle before
he constructed the deductive logic with which he presented it. In curriculum
design, that leaves us with two choices: (1) to present Archimedes' conclusions
as static entities that students may learn to work with, but not understand
as construction of human genius; or (2) to pursue an image of how Archimedes
may have constructed an understanding of the patterns and relationships
that his principles summarize, and build activities that enable students
to think like Archimedes. This presentation will provide examples of reconstructions
of the inventive cognition of Archimedes. As well, it will report on the
design experiment research that is constructing and field-testing curriculum
using those cognitive reconstructions in Canadian high school classrooms.
Michael
R. Matthews
University of New South Wales,
Australia
I wish to argue for the following
nine theses:
- Education, in the Liberal
Tradition, is concerned with the betterment of individuals, society
and culture. The Betterment thesis.
- Science education can make
distinct contributions to cultural betterment. The Cultural
thesis.
- One important cultural
contribution of science education is developing, by appropriate introduction
of history of science a sense of belonging to, and participating in,
a scientific tradition of thought that has successfully striven for
an understanding of nature and for the improvement of society. The Tradition
thesis.
- All science programmes
should ensure that students have some exposure to the milieu, personalities
and accomplishments of the creators of the seventeenth century European
Scientific Revolution. The Origins thesis.
- The originators of the
17th century scientific revolution in Europe expected that their new
methodology in natural philosophy (physical science) would be applicable
to other areas of human inquiry and debate. The Extension
thesis.
- The social, religious,
cultural and political circumstances of the scientific revolution were
appalling. The Background thesis.
- The Enlightenment thinkers
of the late 17th and 18th centuries consciously tried to extend the
methodology of the new science to investigations, problems and disputes
in religion, politics, economics, ethics and other areas. The Enlightenment
thesis.
- Despite a certain amount
of heterogeneity among contributors to the Enlightenment, one can tease
out at least ten common tenets of Enlightenment ideology. The Core
thesis.
- Science students should
be suitably introduced to the aspirations, achievements and failures
of the Enlightenment. The Examination thesis.
Barbara
McMillian
University of Manitoba, Canada
During the late winter and
early spring (13 February - 24 March), I had the opportunity to pilot
a study focused on teacher candidates and the teaching of science during
the practical, school-based component of an After-degree, Bachelor of
Education program. The study was to determine whether the planning, teaching,
and assessment methods presented in the course, Early Years Curriculum
and Instruction in Science & Health 1, have a chance of being implemented
by Early Years teacher candidates in their 6-week practical experience.
A Grade 4 curriculum was developed that (1) encouraged students to begin
to think more scientifically about light, (2) included stories of light
investigations of Archimedes and Newton, and the technological innovations
of Gutenberg, van Leeuwenhoek, Robert Hooke, among others, and (3) helped
students attain the government mandated outcomes for the Grade 4 science
cluster, "Light". A Year 1 candidate in a Grade 4 placement agreed to
teach the lessons. We soon recognized that the 10% of a teaching day suggested
by Manitoba Education for science teaching and learning is inadequate
for implementing the essential phases of a good science lesson (engagement,
exploration, explanation, elaboration, and evaluation (with closure).
With young and inquisitive children, the lessons seldom progressed beyond
a short discussion of what was observed and/or measured during exploration
(first-hand investigations or laboratory-like work). Moreover, if time
was made available for thinking and writing, the most important components
of the engagement and explanation phases were invariably eliminated. The
classroom teacher was very aware of the time constraints and the children's
enthusiasm for science, but seldom offered to shorten the time set aside
in the 6-day cycle for other subjects, projects, and activities.
Don
Metz
University of Winnipeg, Canada
According to Thomas Kuhn, a
significant part of normal science is the fact gathering,
empirical work which is intended to illustrate an existing paradigm. Some
of this effort focuses on the determination of physical constants such
as the astronomical unit (AU). For Kuhn, normal science is also what prepares
students for membership in a particular scientific community and is embodied
in some form in our science textbooks. However, neither Kuhn nor the textbook
says much about the individuals who practiced normal science, especially
those who had been relegated to the hack duties of long and
arduous measurement and calculation.
In this paper, to provide a context for students of astronomy, I will
outline the story of William Wales, an obscure British astronomer. Wales,
toiling in the shadow of Halley (of Halley's comet fame), Mason and Dixon
(of Mason and Dixon line fame) and the infamous Captain Cook endured a
brutal winter in northern Canada for a brief glimpse of the 1769 transit
of Venus. In the end, Wales supplied one small puzzle piece for the determination
of the astronomical unit and exemplified the human spirit and persistence
of a Kuhnian puzzle solver.
Daniel
Osewold
Carl von Ossietzky University
of Oldenburg, Germany
The main aim of the study is
to form a curriculum with a strong historical background. The development
of the curriculum is joined with the connection between students
conceptions and historical ideas on mechanical waves. The idea to find
these conceptual connections based on the approach of Piaget/Garcia (see
Piaget & Garcia, 1989). The research framework Educational Reconstruction
proposed by Kattmann et al. (1996) enabled this connection with the perspective
for developing a curriculum.
In the talk, I present different types of students conceptions on
mechanical waves, which I have identified by analysing interviews with
50 students. I discuss these types in connection with historical explanations
and descriptions of waves (e.g. Leonardo da Vinci, Christiaan Huyghens,
Ernst-Heinrich und Wilhelm Weber). I would emphasize the similarities
between the students conceptions and the historical ideas on mechanical
waves.
The paper closes with perspectives of applying the discussed connections
to physics teaching, and remarks on potentials of this application to
enhance students' conceptual understanding.
W.
Gerhard Pohl
Austrian Chemical Society,
Linz, Austria
The properties of matter including
chemical reactivity have something to do with its microscopic structure.
For explanation of macroscopic changes of matter Greek philosophers developed
the model of atoms. Molecular models have been used by Dalton, Loschmidt
and van´t Hoff to explain the properties of matter. The first experimental
evidence for the real existence of molecules was a phenomenon called Brownian
movement described in 1827 by the Scottish botanist Robert Brown.
Physicists were fascinated by this observation, that very small particles
suspended in a liquid show irregular movements when observed with a microscope.
This movements did continue indefinitely without supply of energy to the
system. Several qualitative explanations of this phenomenon were put forward
in the 19th century. The first quantitative theory was published by Albert
Einstein in 1905. Marian von Smoluchowski developed a theory of Brownian
movement from different points of view in 1906, arriving at the same conclusions
as Einstein.In 1908 Jean Perrin published experimental results supporting
the Einstein-Smoluchowski theory. In 1912 the invention of x-ray diffraction
by Max von Laue showed the existance of atoms, ions and molecules in crystalline
solids. This method made it possible to build exact molecular models.
Molecules of increasing size could be visualized by the indirect method
of x-ray diffraction. Linus Pauling reached a break-through in understanding
protein structures in the 1950s. Max Perutz finally showed the interdependance
of structure and function after determining the 3D-structure of hemoglobin.
By combining the results of model building and x-ray diffraction Watson
and Crick found the DNA double-helix in 1953. This was the start of understanding
genetics in molecular dimensions. Binnig and Rohrer, by the invention
of the scanning tunneling microscope (STM) in 1982 found a more direct
way to visualize the structure of solids atom by atom. During recent years
a growing number of 3D-structures of biological macromolecules has been
visualized after x-ray diffraction analysis. In most cases structure-function
relations are found from these pictures. Molecular models have thus contributed
enormously to understanding processes in living cells and have shown new
ways for treatment of molecular diseases.
All these experimental findings are excellent tools for teaching. I find
it important to stress that we are dealing with models and atoms should
not be imagined as solid spheres like glass beads even if they look so
in STM-pictures.
Literature:
W.G. Pohl, From Democrit to Hyperchem. Models in chemistry education of
engineers. In: Education by Communication. Schriftenreihe Ingenieurpädagogik
Bd. 36, 1996, p 553-562; A. Melezinel, I. Kiss (Eds.) ISBN 3-88064-266-4
W.G. Pohl, Models in teaching
the history of chemistry. XX. International Congress of History of Science
1997, book of abstracts SU 12
David
Rudge
Western Michigan University, USA
Enlist, Equip and Empower:
A Program for the Preparation of Middle School Science Teachers
is an NSF sponsored project aimed at recruiting qualified and caring individuals
into the profession, providing training specific to the needs of middle
school science teachers, and supporting teachers during the first crucial
years of their careers. In this paper I discuss three ways history of
biology is being used to promote understanding of the nature of science.
These include recapitulating the discovery of blood circulation (William
Harvey), discovering why dark moths became more common in soot darkened
areas after the industrial revolution (Bernard Kettlewell), and exploring
a mystery disease (sickle cell anemia) from the standpoint of six subdisciplines
in biology (Anthony Allison).
Christian
Sichau
Deutsches Museum Munich, Germany
Textbooks and science as (often)
taught in the class room focus on general scientific principles, concepts
and natural laws which are considered to be universally valid and timeless.
In the past objects in museums scientific instruments and apparatuses
have mainly been used to illustrate and explain these
general ideas and their discovery (the physics
gallery in the Deutsches Museum opened in 1959 is a good example); we
find a similar situation today in many science centres. In this paper
I will turn the perspective around: My starting point are the objects
as found in museums (or: in the real world) with all their peculiarities
and their individual histories. I will show that the rich stories which
then emerge can provide many important insights into the history and nature
of science. The real strength of a museum consists, as I will argue, in
these complementary aspects of science teaching.
Arthur
Stinner
University of Manitoba, Canada
I will summarize my thinking
about how to launch the last phase of our research, that is, connecting
the history of science with classroom teaching, using a modified version
of our "Units of Historical Presentations"
Jürgen
Teichmann
Deutsches Museum Munich, Germany
I will demonstrate by examples
from the history of astronomy how this science changed from a classical
observational to a laboratory dominated science. By new experimental/instrumental
methods like spectroscopy, photometry and later on radio and x-ray astronomy,
also the profession of an astronomer changed totally. The necessity of
high technology for this progress created the Big Science Astrophysics.
But in spite of this it remained a strongly philosophical
science: The cosmos plays the metaphorical role of an unknown ocean!
What is the origin and what is the end of the world? How singular is mankind
at all?
All this makes history of astronomy in the 20th century a splendid example
to combine science and reflections about science within education of science.
Examples from the large Astronomy exhibition and from the teacher training
courses in the Deutsches Museum Munich, Germany may prove this.
John
Theibault
Chemical Heritage Foundation,
USA
Brigitte
van Tiggelen
Louvain de Neuve, Belgium
When it comes to teach chemistry, one has to deal with some a priori statements
such as the opposition between natural and artificial, sanity and pollution,
and so on. Among the substances that are most associated to these antinomies,
one can find chlorine and plastics. Even if mention is made by the teacher
that macromolecules are also to be found among living organisms, most
students end up with the idea that macromolecules are "man-build".
The idea of using history as a new teaching tool to reframe concepts such
as polymers and macromolecules came out from a conference organized for
teachers on the historical developments of plastics, and emerged from
the teachers themselves. The long history of rubber associated with the
chemical questions it raised from the XVIIIth century onwards made this
material the most suitable candidate to encompass all aspects of notions
ordinarily taught in this chapter. The teaching sequence makes use of
several different student activities (text reading, experiments, modeling
macroscopic properties at different microscopic level, ) and has
shown, after testing, to be much more efficient than the usual framework.
In contrast with the story
of natural and synthetic rubber, the teaching sequence on
halogens does not give attention at all to the problematic image of chemistry
in the public opinion. It is rather aimed at making discover by the students
what a column of the periodic table is or means. Since chlorine - and
even more the other halogens- is quite tricky to manipulate, all experiments
are carried out by the teacher alone, but they form the core of reasoning
chain.
Most operations require a good knowledge and command of "Microgas
chemistry", a term coined by Bruce Mattson (Creighton university)
to name a technique allowing the production and manipulation of small
quantities of gases in 60mL syringes, safely and with a minimum amount
of chemical products, hence of waste. The narrative follows the sequel
of the isolation of halogens, putting emphasis on the similar properties
and the inference, as early as the beginning of the XIXth century, of
a kind of "chemical family". History also documents these discoveries,
and show how the different conceptual settings explained the chemical
behavior from phlogiston times to contemporary chemistry. First testing
is on the way.
Ian
Winchester
University of Calgary, Canada
This history of physics since
the 17th century is initially a history that brings four of the old Greek
disciplines together: physics, arithmetic, geometry and astronomy. A large
part of geometry for the Greeks was connected with the study of the right
angled triangle. It turns out that most of the early thinking in "natural
philosophy" in the late 16th and 17th centuries continued that trend.
Thus in the work and discussions of Descartes, Kepler, Copernicus, Galileo
and Newton the right angled triangle is central to their physical thought.
Newton's approximation methods relating to the infinitesimal calculus,
as indeed those of Leibniz, also presupposed that the one definite result
that could be found when two of three variables were in a sufficiently
near connection weas that of the right angled triagle. Even in the physics
of our own time any actual calculations in, for example, general relativity,
require that one calculate locally and use the facts of the Pythagorean
theorem.
In engineering similar calculations are everywhere. The screw, the wedge,
the inclined plane find there way into mechanical engineering ubiquitously.
Similarly in electrical engineering the right angled triangle is central
to all calculations requiring an understanding of regularly fluctuating
alternate currents.
If it were not true that in Euclidian space the Pythagorean theorm were
true, or if it were not possible to appoximate more sophisticated spaces
by Euclidean spaces for local calculation purposes, physics and engineering
would be impossible.
Gudrun
Wolfschmidt
University of Hamburg, Germany
- Magnetism in Cultural History,
Geophysics and Astronomy
- Three Examples for Contextual
Teaching
I present three examples of
instruments used in the field of magnetism.
First I discuss the development of the compass in China, in three steps
(Sinan, Zhinanyü and Zhinanzhen), followed by its transfer to the
western countries in the 13th century. Then I examine pre-1600 experiments
with magnets and their applications to navigation, as well as the topic
of the Earth as a magnet. Finally I mention the importance of the compass
for sundials.
Alexander von Humboldt (1769--1859) initiated a European geomagnetic network
in 1829. In 1833 Carl Friedrich Gauß (1777--1855), in collaboration
with Wilhelm Weber (1804--1891), founded the "Magnetischen Verein''
in Göttingen. I present, in this context, the construction of magnetometers
and the further development of geomagnetic observatories.
Finally I discuss the solar-terrestrial relationships discovered in the
middle of the 19th century, as well as their effects on the Earth including
auroras, geomagnetic storms and radio interference. I show examples of
the measurement of solar and cosmic magnetic fields by using radiotelescopes
and satellites.
Gabor
Zemplen
University of Budapest, Hungary
The International Baccalaureate
Organization (IBO) launched a Theory of Knowledge (TOK) course in the
diploma programme in 1999. The short course description states that:
TOK is an interdisciplinary requirement intended to stimulate critical
reflection on the knowledge and experience gained inside and outside the
classroom. The course challenges students to question the bases of knowledge,
to be aware of subjective and ideological biases and to develop the ability
to analyse evidence that is expressed in rational argument.
TOK is a key element in encouraging students to appreciate other cultural
perspectives. The course is unique to the IBO, which recommends at least
100 hours of teaching time spanning the programmes two years .
The subject is structured around the so called TOK diagram, organising
approaches areas of knowledge, ways of knowing and focusing on the knower(s):

In case all areas and ways are treated with equal
emphasis, appr. 10 contact hours are left for discussing and studying
the natural sciences. I have earlier argued for potential conflicts between
the general approach taken by the critical-thinking skills oriented TOK
and traditional science subjects, and have highlighted some possible solutions
(Zemplén 2006).
In the paper I am going to describe a 6 week module (12 x 45 minutes)
that tries to tackle major nature of science issues from an
unusual perspective. Following recent trends in science studies (Collins
2002, Labinger and Collins 2001) I will attempt to develop a view of science
that grows out of sociological and anthropological considerations of expertise
and views on legitimation (Weber). The broad sociological starting point
can help students understand the presence of values in science, the often
criticised bias that scientists at times show and still appreciate science
as a privileged form of knowledge-production. This approach runs counter
to general trends, where science is first introduced as characterisable
with a distinct and specific method, reliance on empirical data and logical
reasoning (as opposed to other social institutions), and this view is
gradually softened once it is recognised that there is no
distinct scientific method, there is no guarantee to cut nature at its
joints, or a guarantee that the observations will favour one theory as
opposed to another. The traditional approach has to make concessions to
account for science in practice. The road the pilot module takes is the
opposite: starting from soft, social considerations one can
appreciate the renewing attempts of scientists to tackle sources of errors
and acquire as reliable knowledge as possible about the natural world.
Topics in the 6-week module also include reflection on the choices students
make: is it based on the arguments that parties put forth or based on
evaluation of the expertise of speakers? What is the difference between
accepted science and not accepted forms of knowledge production in the
light of this socialising approach? Can one grasp the nature and significance
of scientific method using this model?
The study is based on classroom-experience carried out in 2006. I will
give outlines of the classes, responses from the students, and report
on successes and failures and eagerly wait for helpful comments
Collins H. M. 2002. The Third
Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience Social Studies
of Science, Vol. 32, No. 2, 235-296
Labinger, J. A.; Collins, H. 2001. The one culture? A conversation about
science,. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zemplén, G. Á. 2006. Conflicting Agendas: Critical Thinking
versus Science Education in the International Baccalaureate Theory of
Knowledge Course. accepted for Volume 16 Numbers 4-5, May 2006 of Science
and Education.
|